（新春走基层）宝成线上的五等小站：“90后”接力守护安全******
中新网绵阳1月18日电 (邓文鑫)“车站是第二个家，我们准备了香肠腊肉，还包了饺子，在这里好好过个年。”临近除夕，在位于四川省绵阳市江油市雁门镇的斑竹园车站，青工郎依王杰一边忙着贴春联，一边说他跟家人商量好了，今年除夕他当班，就不回家吃年夜饭了。
斑竹园车站地处西南山区腹地，原名雁门坝站，始建于1958年，是宝成线上的一座五等小站。小站虽小，但位于宝成铁路大动脉上，扼整条铁路线咽喉，一旦行车组织不畅，便会影响整条线路的安全畅通。
斑竹园车站站长刘胜介绍，火车从邻站进入这里，必须经过20多个遂道和10多座桥梁，其中有4000多米长的会龙场隧道和50多米高的清江2号大桥，而这一桥一隧均是宝成线之最。
斑竹园车站地处西南山区腹地，是宝成线上的一座五等小站。 邓文鑫 摄站长刘胜是一位1994年出生的小伙，和他搭档的，是1992年出生的副站长尹邦杰。除此之外，小站还有5名“95后”青工，他们接过老一辈铁路人的接力棒，坚守小站，在春运期间守护铁路大动脉的安全畅通。
春运期间，由于列车增多，斑竹园车站每天通过的列车达到了200余列，有开往北京、上海、青岛、福州、兰州、呼和浩特等地的客车，还有奔向俄罗斯、波兰、德国、格鲁吉亚的中欧班列。列车密度大时，助理值班员几分钟就要接一列。
与信号楼进行安全联控。 邓文鑫 摄“X8062次，斑竹园站二道通过。”1月18日12时17分，95年出生的车站值班员郭小峰与司机安全联控。2分钟后，满载集装箱的中欧班列从车站呼啸而过，一头扎进隧道里，消失在北上的茫芒大山之中。
山谷中的车站，冬天风很大，加上列车通过时卷起的巨大风浪，刮在脸上就跟刀子一样。在现场接发列车的助理值班员陈林紧了紧身子，全神贯注地监视列车运行，顾不得揉一揉冻得发僵的耳朵。“远看装载，近看走行。”这位年轻的小伙子谈起工作显得老道熟练：“山高路远，必须对每趟列车进行严密监控，才能确保安全、万无一失。”
“停留车防溜是车站的安全卡控重点，我们每隔三至四个小时就必须检查一次，不能有一丝马虎。”说罢，站长刘胜钻到车下，用手拽了拽卡在车轮和钢轨间的铁鞋。
刘胜今年29岁，因业务精湛、工作认真负责被组织选派到斑竹园站担任站长，他最大的体会就是：火车24小时跑，安全工作一秒也不能松。“车站就是指挥中心，火车要跑得好，靠的是责任心和严格执行作业标准。”他说：“一年365天，无论白天黑夜，还是刮风下雨，守住安全是大伙的天职。”
“每个车站都需要坚守，虽然条件苦了些，但确保大动脉运输畅通是我们必须肩负的责任。每当列车从山谷中安全通过时，大家心中无不感到自豪，更觉得自己的坚守有价值！”刚维护完道岔的副站长尹邦杰说道。
春运期间，每天都有列车呼啸而过，可能不会有旅客注意到斑竹园这样的小站存在，但接车、送车，每日重复，斑竹园车站这群年轻的“守护者”们却做得一丝不苟，他们坚守小站、守护安全，为旅客平安出行贡献着自己的青春力量。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
